What is Value?

Value is traditionally created in the professional publishing industry because content creators are paid to produce original, interesting and stimulating content which the regular attention-strained consumer can have shoved in their face. Now that we can search for reviews on the unlimited shelf-space of Amazon and wade through the infinity pools of iTunes and Fishpond to find even the most obscure content, we don’t have to swim in the mainstream. Niche markets may not be as glamorous as the blockbuster novels which populate the stores of physical bookstores, but they sure are lucrative. If these niches are accessible, personal and ‘findable’ (Kelly 2008) for the people who could potentially be their market, then they can become immensely profitable.

The absolute explosion of content, particularly blogs, online creates an overabundance of opinion and material, but not necessarily value. In the era of the ‘prosumer’ (someone who both produces and consumes content) (Ritzer and Jurgensen 2010) value is determined first, by the ‘findability’ of the content, the consistency of publication, and the authenticity of the content, which then secondly by the amount advertisers pay to invest their money in what they see as ‘talent‘. This is a model embodied by the YouTube blog Eat Your Kimchi, a vlog and blog with over 10 000 000 views, created by two former English teachers who traveled to live in Korea five years ago, and who now earn their keep by publishing videos on Korean music, food, and thoughts they have on living in Korea from a Western’s point of view. The value in this blog is derived by the consistency of their posts, the authenticity and trust created through their honesty and personal approach to dealing with their audience, and the channeling of their enthusiasm and unique perspectives into the niche market of YouTube users who want to learn about foreigners in Korea and Korean KPop and food. This value has been recognized by advertisers and entertainment organizers, who pay to advertise on their channel, and to fly them to countries like Australia to be entertainers.

This same standard of how to determine value has, unfortunately for major media companies such as Time Warner, begun to transfer to the world of professionally produced content. Piracy has swept the rug from under the feet of big media corporations, and flattened the media market to the point where not only blockbusters, but niche market media, can be successful. However, value is still a determiner of success; Netflix uses torrent sites to look at what films and shows they should get the rights to hosting on their service by looking at the most downloaded content. Their success shows that if consumers can get quick, easy access to low cost options to authentic, legitimate content, then the majority of consumers will stop using torrent services; whenever Netflix sets up shop in a new location, torrent traffic dips significantly. Another way to show this is that HBO refuses to license Game of Thrones to Netflix, and look at the results; Game of Thrones has become the most heavily pirated show in torrent history (Ernesto 2013).

In the words of Netflix’ Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos, ‘The best way to combat piracy isn’t legislatively or criminally but by giving good options.”


3 thoughts on “What is Value?

  1. orcadiamccann says:

    Finding a happy medium between citizen-produced content and professional publications can be tough. I like the point you made about ‘findability, consistency and authenticity’ – these are primary things I look for whilst looking for good sources or entertainment online. Slowly people are starting to realise that being hand fed content from the world’s large media moguls is not the only (or best) way to obtain information. Amateur produced content has its flaws, yes – but large scale media corporations (Fairfax etc.) are often capable of the same amount of bias that is thought to be presented by citizen journalists.


  2. mh1993 says:

    Really hadn’t considered how different the playing field is for prosumers and citizen journalists. Having to make their work findable, and publish it consistently, are probably just as, if not more important than the authenticity of the content itself.
    A great read.


  3. slbracken says:

    This is such an excellently explained piece for quite a technical week of content, well done. When doing the reading and trying to wrap my head around the statistical nature of the the long tail I kept bringing myself back to the simple thought of just how many people are out there blogging, not just for university like we may be doing but regularly, daily, trying to get someone to realise the value in their work. Thats not to say people working for big media conglomerates to produce content for us as consumers arent working just as hard, but perhaps their role is recognised more than a nobody behind a laptop. I feel like its almost difficult for say, writers to even catch a break with a publisher traditionally anymore. The focus to niche media success has become so heavy that despite the lack of return, people resort to it because of the obvious shift.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s